His judicial review will be heard at the High Court in Dublin over three days from Jan. The Austrian has now accused the Irish regulator of "opening a second case just get rid of the complainant from the first case," and said it was a "complete procedural mismanagement" after "seven years and five court judgements that all confirmed our position." Schrems, who leads campaign group None of Your Business (NOYB), had first complained to the Irish regulator about Facebook’s EU-US data transfers back in 2013, raising concern over the security of data under US surveillance laws. In the wake of an EU Court of Justice ruling earlier this year that invalidated the Privacy Shield mechanism for EU-US data transfers, the Irish DPC told Facebook in August that it had formed a preliminary view that the social-media giant could no longer rely on SCCs as a legal basis to transfer personal data from Europe to the US. He is challenging the Irish Data Protection Commission’s decision in August to open a second procedure looking into Facebook’s data transfers - parallel to a long-running original complaint - to investigate Facebook's reliance on standard contractual clauses, or SCCs. The review was requested by Austrian privacy activist Max Schrems, who has pursued Facebook through various European courts for many years. A privacy campaigner's Irish judicial review relating to Facebook's data handling will be heard next January, MLex has learned, just weeks after the same court hears a separate case in which Facebook itself is appealing an Irish decision that it can’t use standard contractual clauses to transfer data to the US.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |